Skip to content

“When a Penalty is not a Penalty”

August 28, 2013

Following last weekend’s opening GP3 Series race at Spa-Francorchamps, it was no surprise to see several penalties issued due to avoidable contact.

Yet the penalties – ten-place grid drops for Jack Harvey and Adderly Fong and a five-place demotion for Emanuele Zonzini; all for race two – did little to penalise any of the drivers involved.

The crash strewn event ensured that Harvey and Fong were classified as retired, but listed as 22nd and 25th finishers. With the race two grid largely formed by the results of race one, the punishments were always going to be softened to a degree.
In the end, following their ten-place penalty, Harvey and Fong were made to start from 27th and 26th respectively. Meanwhile Zonzini, who had been classified 27th and last, ended up being promoted to 25th on the grid for race two due to the penalties handed to Harvey and Fong.

While there is no doubt the penalties handed down to the trio were entirely justified, one must surely question the point of these sanctions, when their powers are so severely limited.

It may make more sense to pass any penalties onto the next event’s opening race, where practice and qualifying play such a pivotal role.
For now, that seems unlikely to change.

Thoughts are of course welcome as always.

Advertisements
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: